I had a few minutes before worship at Cropwell Meeting this morning and so turned to the bookcase — a place you’ll often find me in in-between times at churches of all sorts. There was a slim, dark volume with no discernible title on the spine, a mystery book. I pulled it out and it was a 1935 copy of Philadelphia Faith and Practice.
On the inside-front cover was the name of its original owner, who had a surname familiar to anyone who has wandered the graveyard out front. Near the beginning was a history of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting which abruptly ended in the early 1800s, just before the Great Schism. It’s as if history ended there. Only the publication address let on to those in the know that this was the Orthodox Yearly Meeting.
As I started reading passages I was struck by how well written it is. I don’t know why that should be surprising as Philadelphia Orthodox had Friends like Rufus Jones, Thomas Kelly, and Howard Brinton. I guess I wasn’t expecting the official publication to be free of stilted nineteenth century prose.
Here’s a passage from the beginning of its “Worship and Ministry” section that spoke to me:
Our conception of worship is based on a deep-seated faith that God is Spirit, as Christ taught at Jacob’s well, and that man, as spirit, can respond to Him and enter into direct communion and fellowship with Him. This faith in the nearness of God as Spirit sprang out of a fresh and wonderful experience of God in the lives of George Fox and the early Friends. They felt that they found Him as they walked in the fields or as they sat in the quiet of their meetings and they arrived at an unwavering certainty of the real presence of God in the lives of men, which gave them unusual inner strength and spiritual power.
I appreciate that it clearly maps out how God and Humana interact, tying it without much artifice to a particular passage in the gospels. And then it gets real with the image of seekers walking the fields looking to commune with God: such a human depiction. I’ll be checking out whether I have a copy of this F&P in my home library. It seems we’ll worth a read.
A random Google search while waiting for my family to pick me up from Cropwell turned up this 1922 editorial in The Friend. This apparently is the discussion leading up to the new F&P that surprised me!