Getting right back on the horse, I’m teaching Quakerism 101 at Moorestown NJ Meeting Wednesday evenings starting in a few weeks. The original plan was for the most excellent Thomas Swain to lead it but he’s become rather busy after being tapped to be yearly meeting clerk (God bless ‘im). He’ll be there for the first session, I’ll be on my own for the rest. A rather small group has signed up so it should be nice and intimate.
For the last year I’ve been pondering the opportunities of using mid-week religious education and worship as a form of outreach. Emergent Church types love small group opportunities outside of the Sunday morning time slot and it seems that mid-week worship is one of those old on-the-verge-of-death Quaker traditions that might be worth revitalizing and recasting in an Emergent-friendly format.
Last Spring I spent a few months regularly attending one of the few surviving mid-week worships in the area and I found it intriguing and full of possibilities but never felt led to do more. It seemed that attenders came and went each week without connecting deeply to one another or getting any serious grounding in Quakerism.
Reflecting on the genesis of a strong Philadelphia young adult group in the mid-1990s, it seemed like the ideal recipe would look something like this:
- 6pm: regular religious ed time, not super-formal but real and pastoral-based. This would be an open, non-judgemental time where attenders would be free to share spiritual insights but they would also learn the orthodox Quaker take on the issue or concern (Barclay essentially).
- 7pm: mid-week worship, unprogrammed
- 8pm: unofficial but regular hang-out time, people going in groups to local diners, etc.
Unprogrammed worship just isn’t enough (just when y’all thought I was a dyed-in-the-plain-cloth Wilburite…). People do need time to be able to ask questions and explore spirituality in a more structured way. Those of us led to teaching need to be willing to say “this is the Quaker take on this issue” even if our answer wouldn’t necessarily pass consensus in a Friends meeting.
People also need time to socialize. We live in an atomized society and the brunt of this isolation is borne by young adults starting careers in unfamiliar cities and towns: Quaker meeting can act as a place to plug into a social network and provide real community. It’s different from entertainment, but rather identity-building. How do we shift thinking from “those Quakers are cool” to “I’m a Quaker and I’m cool” in such a way that these new Friends understand that there are challenges and disciplines involved in taking on this new role.
Perhaps the three parts to the mid-week worship model is head, spirit and heart; whatever labels you give it we need to think about feeding and nurturing the whole seeker and to challenge them to more than just silence. This is certainly a common model. When Peggy Senger Parsons and Alivia Biko came to the FGC Gathering and shared Freedom Friends worship with us it had some of this feel. For awhile I tagged along with Julie to what’s now called The Collegium Center which is a Sunday night Catholic mass/religious ed/diner three-some that was always packed and that produced at least one couple (good friends of ours now!).
I don’t know why I share all this now, except to put the idea in other people’s heads too. The four weeks of Wednesday night religious ed at Moorestown might have something of this feel; it will be interesting to see.
For those interested in curriculum details, I’m basing it on Michael Birkel’s Silence and Witness: the Quaker Tradition (Orbis, 2004. $16.00). Michael’s tried to pull together a good general introduction to Friends, something surely needed by Friends today (much as I respect Howard Brinton’s Friends for 300 Years it’s getting old in the tooth and speaks more to the issues of mid-century Friends than us). Can Silence and Witness anchor a Quakerism 101 course? We’ll see.
As supplementary material I’m using Thomas Hamm’s Quakers in America (Columbia University Press, 2003, $45), Ben Pink-Dandelion’s Convinced Quakerism: 2003 Walton Lecture (Southeastern Yearly Meeting Walton Lecture, 2003, $4.00), Marty Grundy’s Quaker Treasure (Beacon Hill Friends House Weed Lecture, 2002, $4.00) and the class Bill Tabor pamphlet Four Doors to Quaker Worship (Pendle Hill, 1992, $5.00). Attentive readers will see echos from my previous Quakerism 101 class at Medford Meeting.
What is Quakerism really about? If you asked one of the early guys, no doubt you’d get a lot of slightly spiritualized 17th Century Puritan theology, with the Quaker twist. But the essence of it was that God was accessible for teaching and guidance. That belief and experience gave a particular shape to the denomination they eventually founded – but the essence, the Truth, is still that God is available to teach his people himself. He never said that all his people were Quakers, that these were the only people he was willing to teach, that he would force teaching on people who weren’t looking for it.
You can revive everything else about previous incarnations of Quakerism – and even if these are excellent traditions, as they often are – this in itself can only invite people to the Quaker Museum.
I like to dig into old traditions and scriptures and notions myself, because it reminds me of God. Sometimes, instead, it reminds me of how people can know God without (usually) Having It All Down. (Something I keep looking for, someone who Has It All Down. Not that it would do me much good, still having to digest It All myself…)
Yes, it was a delight and a wonder and an honor to find out that I was a Quaker, that there had been others I could approve and appreciate and learn from, all that. But the plain fact is, their movement went into a coma, sending up the occasional odd saint from time to time, but mostly continuing to serve the lukewarm as a nice little church.
I would like to see Quakerism tried again, in whatever shape it might take, this century. But I think this will happen, less by studying “Quakerism” than by meeting God. If our meetings for “worship” are not serving as occasions for that (and I agree, by observation I pretty much doubt it!) we should best study how people come to know God better, in any tradition that helps.
I like this idea too. Gee, some of Chris’s and my first dates were coffee after the Seeker’s Class at 15th St Meeting.
Our mid-week meeting for worship in San Francisco ordinarily has a focus on peace concerns — it was set up originally as an outlet for anger and frustration (besides Sunday morning worship) starting in 2001. But we have also had good success with holding adult religious education programs in conjunction with it. It runs Tuesday evenings: 6:00 meeting for worship, 6:45 brown bag supper, 7:15 program. When there’s not a planned program, some Friends consciously try to schedule clearness or other committee meetings for Tuesday evenings after the worship.
In our Meeting, we are looking at different modes of adult religious education. One of the things I’m most excited about right now is a Saturday night film screening and dessert potluck- two or three films from http://www.nooma.com and discussion after/between. I first heard about these films from Gregg Koskela because he showed one as part of their programmed worship. They’re short (like ten minutes) post-modern films about God and other religious topics. They come on DVD with a study guide. Open to everyone, but with specific outreach to young adult Friends. Hosted by me from the Ministry and Oversight Committee and a couple of younger Friends.
We’ll see how it goes!
I was visiting a Philly meeting this weekend, affiliated with a Q school, Westtown by name. I went a bit early and found a group setting up for some singing from the FGC hymnal. I was invited to join, and did, with some awkwardness. I was not in a ‘settled’ frame of mind as yet.
I tell this because I was surprised that I found the at-first mechanical singing in unison, of a familiar hymn/tune, was what I needed to start centering. I later ministered to the effect of experiencing a bridge of sorts: quakerism old and new, my own church upbringing (not quaker) and from the secular to the sacred.
Martin is speaking about teaching the old ways, reviving quaker traditions, teaching Q101 with new sources. I applaud all that. Even to the statement of newcomers needing to hear the ‘quaker take’ on an issue. Except I would perhaps not be willing to say ‘the’ but more ‘a’ quaker take, since I find it precarious to be able to identify ‘the’ quaker take. So have the historians over the years. Some like Braithwaite apparently wanted Quakerism to be understood as a derivative of Puritanism, in order to be considered for the WCC. I would not put Quakers in that tradition, nor would Brinton, I believe.
But newcomers need a framework, and after that, I like what Forest said, (alone with Ambler), that Fox’s message was you have within you all you need to know the Presence. Go for it.
tbc
Ian
I was visiting a Philly meeting this weekend, affiliated with a Q school, Westtown by name. I went a bit early and found a group setting up for some singing from the FGC hymnal. I was invited to join, and did, with some awkwardness. I was not in a ‘settled’ frame of mind as yet.
I tell this because I was surprised that I found the at-first mechanical singing in unison, of a familiar hymn/tune, was what I needed to start centering. I later ministered to the effect of experiencing a bridge of sorts: quakerism old and new, my own church upbringing (not quaker) and from the secular to the sacred.
Martin is speaking about teaching the old ways, reviving quaker traditions, teaching Q101 with new sources. I applaud all that. Even to the statement of newcomers needing to hear the ‘quaker take’ on an issue. Except I would perhaps not be willing to say ‘the’ but more ‘a’ quaker take, since I find it precarious to be able to identify ‘the’ quaker take. So have the historians over the years. Some like Braithwaite apparently wanted Quakerism to be understood as a derivative of Puritanism, in order to be considered for the WCC. I would not put Quakers in that tradition, nor would Brinton, I believe.
But newcomers need a framework, and after that, I like what Forest said, (alone with Ambler), that Fox’s message was you have within you all you need to know the Presence. Go for it.
tbc
Ian
Martin,
I’m working with this model (or something like it) these days as well. After about a year of dreaming and scheming, a f/Friend and I finally pulled together a mid-week meeting on our college campus. So far, we’ve done unprogrammed worship, worship sharing, and hymn singing. We hope to have some Bible study soon. We’ve averaged ten people a week so far.
I really related to what you were saying about the challenge of getting people to identify with Friends rather than just pass through and think it was pretty cool. At first, I was disappointed that our attenders seemed to rotate a lot, and there was very little spoken ministry (and what there was came from those of us who are already Friends). When I get disappointed like that, I try to call myself back to an understanding of servitude; God is using me to do this for whatever ends God may have- not my own. I never know what openings will happen in a person’s soul as result of joining worship for one week, even if they never come back.
love,
kody
P.S. I was excited to see Ben’s Walton Lecture on your list. I was there when it was given!
I’d like to know more about how the Freedom Friends worship. I like Peggy’s blog very much. I too feel that silence alone doesn’t cut it (but worship without a significant amount of silence is worse).
We need to develop alternatives.
hey Martin -
A few folks around here (Boston) have been gathering here and there in people’s homes for a little worship, singing and what not. It’s been a really powerful experience. We managed to pull together a little semi-programmed worship a few months ago, and that seemed to have a bit of life to it. Now, I’m in the process of seeing if folks want to make it a more regular thing, like one Wednesday a month. I’ll let you know how it goes.
The first thing someone asked was,“Is it under the care of a Meeting?” Yikes. I didn’t know how to respond. “No.” I guess it depends on a) whether this becomes a regular thing, and b) whether Friends gathered feel like a particular Meeting should be approached on the matter. I looked high and low for guidance on this in F&Ps, and it seemed like all the stuff about worship groups was written on the assumption that they would want to be a full-fledged Meeting one day (or at least act like one), and I’m not at all sure if that’s the case.
I guess it would help if all the folks who have expressed interest were from the same Meeting, but that’s not so. We’ll see.
Anyway, good ideas and thoughts. Thanks,
R
Hi Rob,
The whole care & non-care of the meeting issue is an ambiguous one. At this year’s FGC Gathering we had some great outreach sessions with Western Friends and one of the most marked differences was how loose they were with formal meeting establishment. Meetings tend to start organically, often without any formal Quaker body even knowing. Some start small and stay small, with no interest in doing anything other than serving a small inward-looking community. Others wait until they’ve hit a self-defined critical mass and then approach the nearest compatible meeting to discuss formal affiliation.
Eastern Friends love their process of course and while I appreciate care and attention in these matters I also have to note that the loose process of Western Friends has actually started a whole lot more meetings! I wouldn’t sweat it much. It sounds like your group is doing some very needed work – I’m jealous of course! If and when it’s time to hook up with others or incorporate more I trust you’ll know it.
I would LOVE to be a member of your class. I bet I would learn tons and grow in my faith. I agree that we need more than unprogrammed worship. Friends for most of our history spent so much time together talking about their faith, reading the Bible together, sharing meals. In our modern times these moments of faith sharing and growing need to be carved out. Yearly Meeting just is not enough for me. I need more and seek more.
Thanks Martin for articulating this clearly.
Hi Peterson, thanks for your vote of confidence. Last night was the third of the four sessions and what was fascinating was how self-directed it was. Let me get out my notebook.… let’s see, we talked about heaven and hell, the afterlife, the Quaker cautions against drinking and gambling and the possibilities for spiritual refreshment offered by long car commutes and showers.
We occasionally touched base on our homework readings (Bill Taber’s _Four Doors to Meeting for Worship_ and Birkel’s chapter on “Nurturing the Inward Life”) but the participants were hungry for an opportunity to to talk about these kind of issues among themselves. It can be dangerous letting a group go on its tangents – I’ve seen situations where the more-forward members start to dominate conversation – and so I kept scanning the circle of eight for any body-language clues that they might be dropping out but everyone kept remarkably engaged. It felt clear to me that my job was to chime in with the traditional Quaker party line on an issue as a point of information, connect their discussion with the reading and keep things going when the conversation started to lag or repeat itself.
It’s pretty amazing that busy people are willing to spend two hours on a Wednesday night like this.
hello! do you know of any early american quaker crafts for kindergarten to 5th graders that would take 10 – 15 minutes to make?
Greetings from Los angeles! I’m bored to death at work so
I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch
break. I enjoy the info you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
I’m shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my mobile ..
I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, good site!
hello
i have read your blog it is nice
eyes service
http://www.elucentra.com/quickbooks-cloud-hosting.html
Am Genelia Independent Mumbai Escorts Standard Model. Add Fun to your life with Mumbai Escorts we give you hot companionship service in Mumbai.
Mumbai Escorts
Escorts in Mumbai
Mumbai Escorts service
Escorts Mumbai Agency
Mumbai Female Escorts
Independent Mumbai Escorts
Independent Escort Mumbai
Escorts Service in Mumbai
Call Girls Escorts Mumbai
Call Girls in Mumbai
http://genelia.co.in/