Over on Mastodon (yes you should be there), Australian Friend Evan started an interesting discussion about Quaker sing song. This is a form of delivering ministry that seems to date back to the beginnings of our religious society but which barely exists anymore. To my untrained ears it sounds more like something you’d hear in a small Catholic or Orthodox church. Many years ago Haverford College Library excerpted a field recording on a page dedicated to Music and the Early Quakers:
Evan posts to a passage on it from nineteenth-century Quaker chronicler Thomas Clarkson:
The Quakers, on the other hand, neither prepare their discourses, nor vary their voices purposely according to the rules of art. The tone which comes out, and which appears disagreeable to those who are not used to it, is nevertheless not unnatural. It is rather the mode of speaking which na- ture imposes in any violent exertion of the voice, to save the lungs. Hence persons who have their wares to cry, and this almost every other minute in the streets, are obliged to adopt a tone. Hence persons, with disordered lungs, can sing words with more ease to themselves than they can utter th6m with a similar pitch of the voice. Hence Quaker- women, when they preach, have generally more of this tone than the Quaker-men, for the lungs of the female are generally weaker than those of the other
sex.
I’ve always wondered if later opposition to sing song might have been partially motivated by the fact that it was favored by women or sounded a bit too Catholic for Anglicans like Clarkson or Quakers leaning that direction.
There’s a great 2011 post from the now-dormant Quaker Historical Lexicon blog by Illinois Friend Peter Lasersohn. The comments are also great.