Preparing for This

February 5, 2025

My intro­duc­to­ry col­umn in the Feb­ru­ary Friends Jour­nal, regard­ing the light­ning fast deci­sion to file a Quak­er law­suit about immigration:

I think Quak­er busi­ness meet­ings have anoth­er pur­pose: they give us prac­tice in deci­sion mak­ing, and we build trust in one anoth­er. When some­thing extra­or­di­nary comes up that has to be dealt with imme­di­ate­ly, we kick into action using the mus­cle mem­o­ry from all of those Sun­day after­noons spent talk­ing about the finances. Because we’re a reli­gious body that has tak­en the time to know one anoth­er, we can antic­i­pate con­cerns and move sur­pris­ing­ly quickly.

Every­thing is mov­ing crazy fast in the polit­i­cal world these days. That’s the plan, of course: to over­whelm us with the speed at which the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is being dis­man­tled. But we are prac­ticed; we too can respond with stead­fast love and solidarity.

A reminder that you can fol­low my link shares much more quick­ly via my Bluesky account. If you’re there you should def­i­nite­ly fol­low my Quak­ers list for every­thing that Friends are talk­ing about.

I also rec­om­mend Jason Kot­tke’s blog, long one of my favorites, who is turn­ing it over to links and cov­er­age about the coup in progress. Mike Mas­nick has been writ­ing impor­tant stuff about the insan­i­ty of Musk’s twenty-something crew tak­ing over and rewrit­ing pay­ment sys­tems across var­i­ous agen­cies (see, for exam­ple, “A 25-Year-Old Is Writ­ing Back­doors Into The Treasury’s $6 Tril­lion Pay­ment Sys­tem. What Could Pos­si­bly Go Wrong?”)

New Tom Gates blog: Quakers and the End of Scapegoating

January 29, 2025

Philadelphia-area Friend Tom Gates has start­ed a blog. Tom’s a very ground­ed and thought­ful Friend and I’m glad to know we’ll be see­ing more of his writ­ings. From his intro:

Con­tem­po­rary lib­er­al Friends (Quak­ers), in com­mon with oth­er lib­er­al denom­i­na­tions, have large­ly drift­ed away from the Bible, due in part to its seem­ing sanc­tion of divine vio­lence. Girard, by con­trast, sees the over­com­ing of “sacred vio­lence” as the cen­tral theme of the Bib­li­cal wit­ness, and so can pro­vide the means by which Quak­ers (and oth­ers) might reen­gage with the Scrip­tures. Girard’s claim that the bib­li­cal God has “noth­ing to do with vio­lence” will res­onate with Friends tra­di­tion­al com­mit­ment to non­vi­o­lence and peace­mak­ing. His insights into “the scape­goat mech­a­nism” can also help us to under­stand the wit­ness of ear­ly Friends, who func­tioned as “the scape­goat caste” in 17th cen­tu­ry England.

How do we use money?

January 2, 2025

The newest Friends Jour­nal issue is out, look­ing at how we use mon­ey. It’s per­haps not the sex­i­est top­ic but it speaks to what we val­ue as a body of believ­ers. Are we focused on our inter­nal group or on the world out­side our walls? Some­times the dis­cus­sions around mon­ey are tedious and our deci­sions self-evident. I think it’s pos­si­ble for a meet­ing to spend too much time focused on its own self-management. But there are times when dis­cus­sions of resource use brings out sur­pris­ing inspiration.

First up in our fea­tures is Joann Neu­roth’s “Putting Our Mon­ey Where Our Hearts Are,” a look at how her meet­ing in Lans­ing, Michi­gan, took seem­ing­ly tiny steps that have grown into sig­nifi­ant com­mu­ni­ty out­reach and investment.

When we catch our breath to add it all up, we real­ize that the vol­un­teers who “feed the pantry” dai­ly have put $11,000 of food in that box each year. It feels a bit like loaves and fish­es! Where did it come from, one gro­cery bag at a time? We are pret­ty sure any­one propos­ing an $11,000 pro­gram back in 2020 would have been quick­ly set straight about lim­its to our capac­i­ty. But one can of soup at a time, we have tru­ly sur­prised ourselves.

The Quaker Twitter eXodus

December 18, 2024

New Friends Jour­nal arti­cle on some of the Quak­er groups leav­ing Twitter/X this week, fol­low­ing Friends World Com­mit­tee’s Mon­day announce­ment.

There’s been a lit­tle push­back, on X and Red­dit, along the lines that Quak­ers should be rep­re­sent­ed every­where. Our arti­cle quotes Alis­tair McIn­tosh, who post­ed on X:

I pre­fer it when Quak­ers bring an alter­na­tive pres­ence to con­flict zones. Has God not already got suf­fi­cient angels in heav­en? Can we not, as our 1947 Nobel Peace Prize cita­tion quotes it, act “to build up in a spir­it of love what has been destroyed in a spir­it of hatred.”

I get it but I don’t think the metaphor holds. No one is trapped on a social network. 

One prob­lem with this line of rea­son­ing is that it fails to take into account the time and resources that it takes to be on a social plat­form. Face­book, X, Threads, Bluesky, Dis­cord, Tik­tok, Telegram, What­sApp, Red­dit, Mastodon… There are so many social net­works and you can’t be every­where. As a pub­lish­er, you have to choose where you place your atten­tion. X has shot itself in the foot time and time again since Musk came in. He has no idea how to run a social network.

The qual­i­ty of dis­course at X had turned to shit. Much of the audi­ence is gone. Posts with links are down­grad­ed in the algo­rithm, giv­ing pub­lish­ers lit­tle incen­tive to stay. For most pub­lish­ers, the main pur­pose of social net­works is to get peo­ple to their web­sites (hope­ful­ly to sign up for email lists). X is fol­low­ing the lead of Meta (Face­book, Threads, Insta­gram), whose net­works have become increas­ing­ly use­less as they’ve down­grad­ed posts with links.

Many pubs are report­ing they’re now get­ting more refer­ral vis­i­tors from Bluesky than X, even with few­er fol­low­ers. For me, this announce­ment is less about pol­i­tics than it is a recog­ni­tion that X isn’t Twit­ter and that the enshit­ti­fi­ca­tion of the net­work is such that it’s no longer worth our lim­it­ed resources or attention.

When Friends World Com­mit­tee’s World Office came to us and said that a bunch of Quak­er orgs were orga­niz­ing to leave X en masse, I respond­ed with a shrug. It has­n’t felt worth it to stay on X. This is as good a time as ever to leave. Friends Jour­nal has been on Bluesky for over a year and the dis­course is sim­ply better. 

Reading: George Fox – the First Quaker Socialist?

December 2, 2024

Gra­ham Tay­lor with a well-cited arti­cle on the proto-socialism of ear­ly Friends. There’s a bit of anachro­nis­tic think­ing going on here, which he admits to. But it’s also the case that a lot of Quak­er his­to­ry is viewed through the lens of lat­er Quak­ers and often ignores what was hap­pen­ing out­side of Quak­erism at the time. This can lead to bad his­to­ries. I’m not sure I buy some of Tay­lor’s argu­ments but it’s a good exer­cise and Fox cer­tain­ly did talk about eco­nom­ics as part of his call for justice.

Hope and Optimism

December 1, 2024

Decem­ber’s Friends Jour­nal is online and looks at “Spir­i­tu­al Opti­mism vs. Spir­i­tu­al Pes­simism.” I wrote the open­ing col­umn this month and explained why I want­ed to see Quak­ers tack­le this. It seems to me that hope and pes­simism are atti­tudes that tran­scend typ­i­cal reli­gious and polit­i­cal divi­sions. Pick a top­ic or dis­sect a social group and you can usu­al­ly find among them peo­ple who are undaunt­ed by the chal­lenges ahead and oth­ers wor­ried to the point of paral­y­sis. Our reac­tions to Covid these past five years have exposed these fault lines, as is our respons­es to the recent pres­i­den­tial elec­tion. I wrote:

Has there ever been an age in human his­to­ry in which we could be pure­ly opti­mistic or pure­ly pes­simistic? Quak­er founder George Fox wrote that his min­istry arose “when all my hopes in [preach­ers and expe­ri­enced peo­ple] were gone, so that I had noth­ing out­ward­ly to help me, nor could tell what to do.” He famous­ly found inspi­ra­tion, guid­ance, and courage in “one, even Christ Jesus,” who could speak to his con­di­tion. What keeps us going today in a world always ready to implode or blossom?