What are we waiting for?

September 24, 2023

I’m real­ly look­ing for­ward to this Sun­day’s talk by Chris Stern at Crop­well Quak­er Meet­ing. I reg­u­lar­ly wor­shipped with him when I attend­ed Mid­dle­town Meet­ing a num­ber of years ago and I always knew when he rose to speak that we were in for unusu­al­ly thought­ful and Spirit-led min­istry. We talked on the phone prepar­ing for this event a few weeks ago and I real­ly like the sim­ple prompt, “What are we wait­ing for?”

Late September links

September 23, 2023

On Friends Jour­nal, an account from Bruce Bir­chard of Cen­tral Philadel­phia Meet­ing’s response to a sense that wor­ship had got­ten too chat­ty. They want­ed to effect a “spir­i­tu­al ground­ing of Friends wor­ship” and so for­mal­ly record­ed eight min­is­ters and asked them to pre­pare ser­mons for semi-programmed wor­ship ses­sions. Oh wait, this is Cen­tral Philly, HQ of Lib­er­al U.S. Quak­er insti­tu­tion­al­ism, so they could­n’t call them min­is­ters or ser­mons, and while they repeat­ed­ly call it a pro­gram they go out of their way to insist this isn’t any kind of pro­gram­ming. You can read their eight pre­pared ser­mons… *checks notes* eight pre­pared mes­sages here. They’re good, and well worth reading.

Also on FJ, Greg Woods and Jen New­man fin­ish off Sep­tem­ber fea­tures’s with an arti­cle about their work on voca­tion­al dis­cern­ment for young adult Friends.

Work­ing on some arti­cles on Quak­er tes­ti­monies and re-reading Antho­ny Manousos’s 2009 blog post, “How Howard Brin­ton Invent­ed SPICE, the Quak­er Tes­ti­monies,” and Paul Buck­ley’s 2012 talk, “The Ori­gin of the SPICES.” Both gems.

Sad to read of the pass­ing of Mariellen Gilpin in What Canst Thou Say? She was a con­sis­tent­ly thought­ful writer on Quak­er mys­ti­cism, min­istry, and elder­ship for many decades.

A new Quak­er­S­peak this week: Spir­i­tu­al­i­ty on the Road: Five Years of Quak­er RV Liv­ing, an inter­view with Bet­sey Kenworthy.

An expected miracle

September 20, 2023

One of the dis­tinc­tive qual­i­ties of my Friends meet­ing1 is that there is a lot of vocal min­istry, espe­cial­ly for such a small group (we aver­age about 10 – 20 peo­ple depend­ing on time of year and sched­ules). It’s does­n’t feel “pop­corny,” the mild­ly derog­a­tive Quak­er term for mes­sages that come one after anoth­er in rapid fire suc­ces­sion. There is ample time left between mes­sages and they often have the kind of unin­ten­tion­al syn­chronic­i­ty that is one sign of “a gath­ered meeting.”

There are occa­sion­al Sun­days in which we’ll spend the whole wor­ship in silence. It’s usu­al­ly quite sweet. When we break wor­ship, our clerk will acknowl­edge that spe­cial feel­ing but then say with a gen­tle defin­i­tive­ness that Quak­er wor­ship should always have min­istry and that there should always be some­thing from the Bible.2 What our clerk has done is set the expec­ta­tion that min­istry is nor­mal and easy. We’ve had wor­ship in which half of the peo­ple gath­ered have spoken.

I’m get­ting a migraine just look­ing at this flow­chart from 2014. At least it pre­sumes that God and Holy Spir­it might be involved, unlike some of these charts.

I’ve been try­ing to under­stand this approach. See, I’m some­one who tends to over­think min­istry and I’m not alone. Some Friends have gone to the trou­ble to cre­ate elab­o­rate flow charts, a multi-step check­list to deter­mine whether a mes­sage ris­ing in our hearts is one we should speak aloud. Seri­ous­ly, how is any­one expect­ed to get to “Speak!” in under an hour’s time?

There’s per­haps even more pres­sure in Friends meet­ing with pro­gram­ming. There’s often the expec­ta­tion that the min­is­ter will be trained and cre­den­tialed and their ser­mons con­struct­ed the week before over many hours. I appre­ci­ate this sort of lec­ture for­mat and get a lot from them but the bar to par­tic­i­pa­tion is incred­i­bly high.

I was talk­ing recent­ly with Chris Stern, a sea­soned min­is­ter from Mid­dle­town Meet­ing in Lima, Pa.; I reg­u­lar­ly attend­ed there for awhile cir­ca 2006. He’s going to be giv­ing a talk at Crop­well in a few weeks and I was try­ing to explain to him what I’ve been experiencing. 

I think what it boils down to is a con­fi­dence that God (the Holy Spir­it, the Inward Light) is present in our wor­ship. And of course that’s true. God is every­where, all the time: “And remem­ber, I am with you always, to the end of the age.“3 If we expect that the Spir­it is present, we should also expect it to speak to us and through us while we sit togeth­er. We can expect a nudge from the Inward Christ to rise and give ministry. 

Vocal min­istry can be an expect­ed mir­a­cle. The bar to par­tic­i­pa­tion can be just our faithfulness.

QuakerQuaker update

September 20, 2023

The Quak­erQuak­er social media site has been offline for a few months but is some­what back now. I made an archive of the old Ning-powered site and put it up. There have been a lot of impor­tant con­ver­sa­tions there since 2006, includ­ing much of the dis­cus­sion that became the “Con­ver­gent Friends” dis­course, so I’ve want­ed it pre­served. Even­tu­al­ly Google will suc­cess­ful­ly re-index the site and there won’t be so many page-not-found errors. 

The sec­ond phase will be putting a new social media site up. It’s going to be built on Word­Press, so this ver­sion of Quak­erQuak­er should stay use­ful for a while. It will retain the “Prim­i­tive Chris­tian­i­ty Revived, Again” tagline and I will try to repli­cate some of the dis­cus­sion groups. I need to pur­chase some plug-ins for this to work; the ini­tial cost will be $228. If any­one can help out with that with a dona­tion, that would be won­der­ful; there’s also ongo­ing month­ly serv­er bills so if mul­ti­ple peo­ple help out it will all go to good use.

The Cycles of War

September 11, 2023

Twenty-two years ago I was on my hon­ey­moon, whale watch­ing off the coast of Maine, obliv­i­ous to the world. My wife and I had stopped in a cute lit­tle mar­ket when a few snip­pets of words broke through my con­scious­ness from the radio play­ing in the back­ground. I first noticed the hushed solem­ni­ty of the NPR hosts, then dis­joint­ed words: plane, crashed, tow­ers.

Like every­one, we quick­ly pieced togeth­er the hor­ror hap­pen­ing in real time: sec­ond plane, jumpers, col­lapsed. I was pub­lish­ing Non​vi​o​lence​.org then, a peace por­tal, and felt I had to say some­thing, any­thing, so I rushed to the pub­lic com­put­er at the local library. There was a queue of wor­ried patrons want­i­ng to mes­sage loved ones. In a few moments I typed out some rushed words:

Today’s ter­ror­ist attacks are sim­ply hor­ren­dous, thou­sands of inno­cents might well lose their lives. Most impor­tant now is to sit patient­ly, to pray and to not call for mas­sive indis­crim­i­nant attacks that might only kill thou­sands more. Our char­ac­ter as a nation is being test­ed now. We must pray and heal and not respond in a hatred that will only fuel the cycle of war, glob­al injustice

We know how that turned out. Three thou­sand dead in New York and West­ern Penn­syl­va­nia, fol­lowed by hun­dreds of thou­sands in West­ern Asia. Decades of wars in Afghanistan. A sec­ond war in Iraq prompt­ed by the flim­si­est and most unlike­ly of excus­es. Today, after all the blood, those coun­tries are hos­tile and unsta­ble. Yet two of the coun­tries co-responsible were U.S. allies, are still U.S. allies. The 9/11 attacks was planned and large­ly exe­cut­ed by Saud­is; Osama bin Laden was final­ly found liv­ing out in the open in Pak­istan in an upper class com­pound a short walk from the gates of the coun­try’s mil­i­tary acad­e­my. I’m glad we did­n’t invade Sau­di Ara­bia and Pak­istan but it makes one won­der what the oth­er wars were meant to accomplish.

This week many peo­ple are gath­er­ing to remem­ber 9/11, as they should. It was a hor­rif­ic attack. It struck our sense of safe­ty and fueled night­mares and tears. But when do we as U.S. cit­i­zens gath­er to think about how we react­ed? When do we remem­ber hun­dreds of thou­sands who have died since 9/11 in the name of ret­ri­bu­tion and a fear­ful revenge we’ve called free­dom?

Mid-September Links

September 11, 2023

The Sep­tem­ber episode of Quak­ers Today pod­cast dropped, this time an unusu­al look at whether untruth can some­times be more accu­rate than real­i­ty. Bonus: a Bar­bie tie-in!

Also, a new Quak­er­S­peak inter­view, this time with Carl Blu­men­thal talk­ing and Friends and men­tal health. Carl has writ­ten a his­to­ry on this for the mag­a­zine and I had a low-tech video inter­view with him. 

I can relate to Kath­leen Wooten’s metaphor about search­ing for the per­fect pen­cil that would make her effi­cient enough to do every­thing she want­ed (for what it’s worth, Kath­leen always seems to be accom­plish­ing a lot regard­less of mag­ic tools).

Johan Mau­r­er on the spir­i­tu­al resources and iden­ti­ty that a local Friends meet­ing might expect from a year­ly meeting.

The mas­sive dig­i­tal­iza­tion of old news­pa­pers in recent years has allowed his­to­ri­ans to deter­mine the source of the “Under­ground Rail­road” name. 

One corner of Quaker renewal at 20

September 5, 2023

Twen­ty years ago this week I wrote one of my most wide­ly shared blog posts, “The Younger Evan­gel­i­cals and Quak­er Renewal.” 

I was on fire that sum­mer, mak­ing con­nec­tions with a bub­bling up, grass­roots “emer­gent church” move­ment and find­ing oh-so-many unex­pect­ed sim­i­lar­i­ties between these frus­trat­ed, authenticity-seeking younger Evan­gel­i­cals and my super-Liberal East Coast Quak­er world. A lot of the prob­lems were clear­ly gen­er­a­tional and I was lap­ping up new posts by Cana­di­an blog­ger Jor­dan Coop­er. One day he shared a chart from the­olo­gian Robert E. Web­ber’s new book, The Younger Evan­gel­i­cals: Fac­ing the Chal­lenges of the New World, that showed the “dif­fer­ences between the mod­erns (tra­di­tion­al and prag­mat­ic evan­gel­i­cals) and the post­mod­ern (the younger evan­gel­i­cals).

The chart was like a secret decoder ring for me. Web­ber might have been think­ing of more tra­di­tion­al church­es, but with a lit­tle trans­la­tion it lot of it sure explained a lot of what I was see­ing in Quak­erism. Old­er Friends want­ed youth min­istry that was a “Church-centred pro­gram” while I and my dis­af­fect­ed cohorts want­ed “prayer, Bible study, wor­ship, social action.” Old­er Friends thought of Chris­tian­i­ty as a “ratio­nal world­view” or a form of “ther­a­py” where­as I longed for a “com­mu­ni­ty of faith.”

Not much hap­pened after I clicked post. Face­book and Twit­ter weren’t around to pro­mote it. My blog was more-or-less me talk­ing to myself. But over the course of the next few years peo­ple found it. They must have been ask­ing sim­i­lar ques­tions and see­ing what Google turned up. The com­ments have some future Quak­er blog­gers (was this the first post Chris Mohr found and fan-emailed me about?). Even more remark­able, it includes some very unlike­ly Evan­gel­i­cal Friends, like the then-youth pas­tor at First Friends Can­ton and the then-general sec­re­tary of Iowa Year­ly Meet­ing. At the time I was answer­ing the book­store phone at Friends Gen­er­al Con­fer­ence, the most Lib­er­al insti­tu­tion bas­tion of U.S. Quak­ers. To find com­mon cause across this the­o­log­i­cal spec­trum was quite unusu­al then (and alas, prob­a­bly now).

What’s changed after twen­ty years? Well, after a num­ber of false starts there are pro­grams to train younger Friends and bring them into insti­tu­tion­al Quak­erism (Quak­er Vol­un­tary Ser­vice, Pen­dle Hill’s Con­tin­u­ing Rev­o­lu­tion con­fer­ence, and the 1992-founded Guil­ford Col­lege’s Quak­er Stud­ies Pro­gram deserve spe­cial shoutouts). Blogs and lat­er social media have cre­at­ed forums for dis­parate Friends to talk togeth­er in infor­mal con­ver­sa­tions. I’m con­tin­u­al­ly amazed that Friends Jour­nal mag­a­zine (of which I’m senior edi­tor) and Quak­er­S­peak videos can be accessed any­where with­out pay­wall, mak­ing our sto­ries wide­ly acces­si­ble. But some things haven’t changed. We’ve had rounds of Quak­er schisms, espe­cial­ly in North­west, Indi­ana, and North Car­oli­na Year­ly Meetings. 

And how much has changed for indi­vid­ual young adult Friends? The Sep­tem­ber issue of Friends Jour­nal is devot­ed to younger Friends and one break­out arti­cle is Olivia Chalk­ley’s “Young Adults Want What Ear­ly Friends Had.” Olivia came to Friends as a teen and has had the advan­tages of the new­er youth pro­grams — attend­ing Guil­ford QLSP and work­ing at a Quak­er Vol­un­tary Ser­vice fel­low — yet so much of her arti­cle felt like top­ics I dis­cussed on Quak­er Ranter back before my tem­ples went gray. For example:

We often don’t think about the poten­tial Friends who slip through the cracks because there’s not much to grab hold of: those who don’t know where to turn in the silence, not hav­ing a sol­id foun­da­tion in Scrip­ture, Chris­t­ian ethics and social teach­ings, or even Quak­er his­to­ry; those who feel alien­at­ed by the meet­ings in which Friends cringe if you talk about Jesus Christ, or even about God; and those who sim­ply can’t fig­ure out if we are Chris­t­ian or not, due to mixed mes­sag­ing and lack of con­vic­tion among mem­bers of their meet­ings. These obsta­cles must be rec­og­nized and addressed as part of our efforts to present acces­si­ble path­ways to entry, not only for the young adults hun­gry for reli­gious com­mu­ni­ty but also for the poor and work­ing class­es among which reli­gious belief tends to be high, accord­ing to recent Pew studies.

I guess it’s some progress that this arti­cle is pub­lished by Friends Jour­nal and not sit­ting bare­ly read on a per­son­al blog. But as I look back at this twenty-year anniver­sary I find it a lit­tle sad we’re still strug­gling with iden­ti­ty and mes­sag­ing. Maybe this is a peren­ni­al, never-answerable issue for a denom­i­na­tion, espe­cial­ly one as decen­tral­ized as ours. Or maybe it’s some­thing we can con­tin­ue to fig­ure out. Mid-twentieth cen­tu­ry Friends were able to work out a mod­ern vision of Quak­erism that was pow­er­ful enough to reunite and regal­va­nize a dwin­dling Quak­er move­ment; what would our vision look like?