Deferred Horror Close to Home

May 31, 2024

I’ve recent­ly learned that the bombs used for the most dead­liest bomb­ing raid in his­to­ry were made here in South Jer­sey, in a secret muni­tions plant in the mid­dle of the pine bar­rens out­side Mays Landing.

While we typ­i­cal­ly think of Hiroshi­ma and Nagasa­ki as the defin­ing hor­rors of World War 2 bomb­ing, the March 9, 1945 fire­bomb­ing of Tokyo is gen­er­al­ly thought to have been more dead­ly. As this arti­cle writes, “Three hun­dred B29 bombers dropped near­ly 500,000 cylin­ders of napalm and petro­le­um jel­ly on the most dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed areas of Tokyo.” The bombs killed an esti­mat­ed 100,000 peo­ple accord­ing to Wikipedia, though the round­ness of that num­ber hints at the fact that death tolls for city-obliterating bomb­ings are all guesswork.

There are some well-known ruins of ear­ly twentieth-century muni­tion plants in South Jer­sey. The most well-known is the World-War-I-era Beth­le­hem Load­ing plant in Estell Manor, which is locat­ed in what is now one of the loveli­est parks in the coun­ty, amidst nature trails and beau­ti­ful views of rivers and tidal marsh­es. The ruins are cool and in this bucol­ic set­ting, it’s easy to for­get that their prod­ucts result­ed in thou­sands of deaths.

The Tokyo napalm was made else­where, though, at the Nation­al Fire­works plant north­west of Mays Land­ing. I’ve only just learned of it via Red­dit and haven’t gone back there. From pic­tures the ruins look unre­mark­able (and right now is the height of tick sea­son so I’m not trudg­ing back there). The plant pro­duced M69 napalm clus­ter bombs, built not to explode but to set cities aflame. From the book Twi­light of the Gods:

The work­horse of the fire­bomb­ing raids was the M69 napalm incen­di­ary sub­mu­ni­tion, clus­tered in a 500-pound E46 cylin­dri­cal finned bomb. Near­ly all had been pro­duced at a remote and secret plant in the Pine Bar­rens of New Jer­sey, about 15 miles inland from Atlantic City. Each M69 sub­mu­ni­tion or “bomblet” was essen­tial­ly a cheese­cloth sock filled with jel­lied gaso­line, insert­ed into a lead pipe. Thirty-eight M69s were clus­tered togeth­er in an E46, bound by a strap that burst open on a timed fuse. The clus­ters were timed to open at 2,000 feet above the ground. Three-foot cot­ton gauze stream­ers trailed behind each bomblet, caus­ing them to dis­perse over an area with a diam­e­ter of about 1,000 feet. On impact with the ground, a sec­ond fuse det­o­nat­ed and an ejec­tion charge fired glob­ules of flam­ing napalm to a radius of about 100 feet. What­ev­er these glob­ules hit-walls, roofs, human skin- they adhered and burned at a tem­per­a­ture of 1,000 degrees Fahren­heit for eight to ten min­utes, long enough to start rag­ing fires in the teem­ing, close-built wood and paper neigh­bor­hoods at the heart of all Japan­ese cities.”

While Hiroshi­ma and Nagasa­ki are right­ly remem­bered for ush­er­ing into the nuclear age — a sin­gle mod­ern weapon could kill mil­lions—the Tokyo bomb­ing seems to have been dead­lier and it cer­tain­ly set a prece­dent, that it was accept­able to destroy entire cities full of civil­ians for mil­i­tary goals. 

Matt Rosen: Quaker Membership and Convincement

May 23, 2024

Also inter­viewed this month: Matt Rosen, whose dis­tinc­tions between mem­ber­ship and con­vince­ment seem spot-on to our con­di­tion today. Matt’s also part of a group of British young adults plan­ning a very ground­ed con­fer­ence. The Friend pro­filed the orga­niz­ers recent­ly.

Steven Dale Davison: Challenges and Gifts in Quaker Meetings

May 23, 2024

Steven was *that guy* when he joined Friends, com­bat­ive and judgy about oth­er people’s min­istry. In ret­ro­spect, he wish­es his meeting’s clear­ness com­mit­tee had laid down the line when he joined. Even after talk­ing with him I’m a lit­tle skep­ti­cal and hope they saw some­thing in his ini­tial arro­gance that was ready to be over­turned by Quak­er experience.

What does it mean to be a member of a Quaker meeting?

May 2, 2024

Friends Jour­nal’s May issue on “Mem­ber­ship” is out. In my open­ing col­umn I talk about some of the dif­fer­ent types of mem­bers, offi­cial and unofficial:

As the clerk of a small meet­ing, I find myself fre­quent­ly jug­gling these mul­ti­ple cat­e­gories of mem­ber­ship. When we had plumb­ing issues a few months ago, there were lots of emails with a core half-dozen reg­u­lars who I can depend on to help with logis­tics and con­tacts with local con­trac­tors (this group is so con­sis­tent that when I go to send a mes­sage to one, my email pro­gram asks me if I want to include all the others).

When there’s an event com­ing up, the email list expands to include a small group of recent new­com­ers who make it to wor­ship a few times a month. Every so often I look over this list to see if there’s some­one who’s dropped away, and I’ll take a minute to write them a spe­cial email ask­ing how they are and invit­ing them to attend. I would hate for a semi-regular to drop away and think we hadn’t noticed.

There’s also a wide con­stel­la­tion of peo­ple who attend once in a prover­bial blue moon. Some are mem­bers of near­by meet­ings who occa­sion­al­ly hit us up for a change of pace. Oth­ers are local his­to­ry buffs who will come to hear a par­tic­u­lar speak­er but make sure to come ear­ly because they like their once-a-year Quak­er wor­ship. Few of these vis­i­tors will ever become reg­u­lars but they prob­a­bly know some­one who might, and their word-of-mouth rec­om­men­da­tion could help con­nect a new seek­er with our small band.

When it’s time to send out the annu­al fundrais­ing appeal, I’ll reach out to anoth­er, rather spe­cial class of mem­bers, those at a dis­tance, many of whom I’ve nev­er met. They might hail from one of the found­ing fam­i­lies of the meet­ing; per­haps they grew up there them­selves and have fond mem­o­ries. It might be easy to for­get about these mem­bers but that would be a mis­take, as they remind us of the long line of faith­ful ser­vants who have kept this spe­cial com­mu­ni­ty going in the past.

A Mem­ber­ship That Is Ever Flow­ing

I even give a shoutout to the red-shouldered hawk fam­i­ly liv­ing in one of our sycamore trees.

Look­ing back in the archives, we’ve been putting out an issue on mem­ber­ship every four years: Mem­ber­ship and the Gen­er­a­tion Gap in 2012, Almost Quak­er in 2016, Mem­ber­ship and Friends in 2020. I’m actu­al­ly sur­prised at the clock­work pre­ci­sion of our issues, but there’s a good rea­son we keep com­ing back to it. The def­i­n­i­tion of who “we” are is an essen­tial part of our self-identification as Friends. Pret­ty much every­thing we do (or fail to do) reflects our implic­it assump­tions about who’s in and who’s out. Many, per­haps most, of the debates that roil Friends have mem­ber­ship as an element.

Links

May 2, 2024

In 2020, online wor­ship went from a fringe nov­el­ty to a mass phe­nom­e­non. It’s def­i­nite­ly an option that’s here to stay and British Friends have now inte­grat­ed one online wor­ship group ful­ly into the month­ly meet­ing struc­ture (has any oth­er year­ly meet­ing done this already?). It’ll be fas­ci­nat­ing to see how this con­tin­ues to develop.

I was remiss in shar­ing the March Quak­ers Today pod­cast, which looked at Quak­ers, Birds, and Jus­tice. Friends have long been espe­cial­ly inter­est­ed in the nat­ur­al world. One of the inter­vie­wees is Rebec­ca Hei­der, who wrote A Quak­er Guide to Bird­watch­ing in last mon­th’s issue of FJ.

Rightwing Quaker-lovers in the Washington Post

April 15, 2024

It’s so bizarre that some of the peo­ple most rock­ing the old do-no-wrong Quak­er mytholo­gies today are non-Quaker polit­i­cal con­ser­v­a­tives. Exhib­it A has to be Chris­t­ian nation­al­ist Abby Abildness’s obses­sion with William Penn but this week The Wash­ing­ton Post pro­filed “anti-woke” ding­bat Kali Fontanil­la (non pay­walled link).

She told her stu­dents how Quak­ers formed some of the first anti-slavery orga­ni­za­tions in Amer­i­can his­to­ry. How Quak­ers boy­cotted sug­ar, cot­ton and oth­er goods pro­duced through slave labor. She spoke about how Quak­ers lacked offi­cial cler­gy and advo­cat­ed spir­i­tu­al equal­i­ty for men and women.

She did not men­tion that 19th-century slave­hold­ing Quak­ers some­times offered finan­cial com­pen­sa­tion to the enslaved peo­ple they freed. Or that, in 2022, British Quak­ers com­mit­ted to make repa­ra­tions for their past involve­ment in the transat­lantic slave trade and colonialism.

Asked about this, Kali said in an inter­view that she knows not all Quak­ers were per­fect, and that some owned slaves, but that her les­son was meant to give a con­trast and a bal­ance to the “overem­pha­sis” on repa­ra­tions com­ing from the left. She also not­ed that some Quak­ers have become “very left-leaning now.”

So does this mean we’ve ret­conned the Under­ground Rail­road as a right-leaning enter­prise? Per­haps. I think inten­tion­al­ly con­fus­ing polit­i­cal terms like left and right and play­ing dumb about his­to­ry of U.S. polit­i­cal par­ties chang­ing posi­tions is part of the so called “anti-woke” agen­da. It also an attempt to dele­git­imize modern-day Friends who might a) know their his­to­ry (sur­prise!, there were eigh­teenth cen­tu­ry Friends advo­cat­ing repa­ra­tions) and b) have well-informed and con­trary opin­ions.

I’m glad the arti­cle does actu­al­ly push back at some of the Fontanil­la’s half-truths but it’s bad jour­nal­ism to put the counter argu­ments near the end of the arti­cle where casu­al read­ers might miss them. 

It’s even worse jour­nal­ism to not have both­ered to inter­view a Quak­er his­to­ri­an. When pro­fil­ing some­one spew­ing inac­cu­rate infor­ma­tion, it’s com­mon jour­nal­is­tic prac­tice to let them go on for the first three or so para­graphs — enough time for them to incrim­i­nate them­selves — and then bring in some experts to pro­vide a series of quotes that will take down the pre­ced­ing non­sense. Just a few min­utes on the phone with a legit his­to­ri­an of ear­ly Quak­er slave­hold­ing and abo­li­tion — and some bet­ter pac­ing — would have made this a far bet­ter arti­cle. The main­stream press real­ly needs to com­mit to prac­tice aggres­sive­ly fact-based report­ing, even on throw-away pro­file arti­cles like this, even if it risks being called woke.

As I’ve said many times before, there’s a lot of lot of things to be proud of in Quak­er his­to­ry but we’ve also got­ten a lot of things wrong. Our posi­tions on issues like slav­ery, native rela­tions, and prison reform all have had mixed results. In the past it was com­mon for Friends to over-emphasize and over-mythologize the good, as these modern-day non-Quakers con­tin­ue to do. Nowa­days some Friends over-emphasize the bad his­to­ry, which also has its prob­lems. I think it’s impor­tant to embrace both so we can under­stand how our tra­di­tions have led us to past dis­cern­ments that were rad­i­cal­ly lib­er­a­to­ry and also how our process has back­fired on a num­ber of issues.

John Andrew Gallery: The Gospel Model of Fatherly Love

April 15, 2024

I got to talk with fre­quent Friends Jour­nal author John Andrew Gallery this week. His lat­est arti­cle for us explores a gospel mod­el of par­ent­hood. I most appre­ci­at­ed his take that many of the fig­ures in the para­bles were not nec­es­sar­i­ly metaphor­i­cal fill-ins for God but faith­ful peo­ple already liv­ing in the pow­er of the king­dom. I’ll be chew­ing on his take on the prodi­gal son’s for­giv­ing father for awhile.

There’s a page in Friends Jour­nal with oth­er recent author chats. You can sub­scribe to the Friends Jour­nal YouTube chan­nel and watch inter­views going back to 2011 all our Quak­er Author Chat playlist.

Links

April 14, 2024

We’re look­ing for arti­cles on rela­tion­ships for the Sep­tem­ber issue of Friends Jour­nal—fam­i­ly rela­tion­ships, roman­tic ones, men­tor­ships, or spir­i­tu­al Friends.

Pen­dle Hill’s The Seed pod­cast has a great inter­view with Adria Gulizia this week. Some good stuff. Here’s a sam­ple: “Peti­tions and demands is how the world works. That’s how the polit­i­cal sys­tem works. That’s not how the reli­gious Soci­ety of Friends is sup­posed to work. And yet, they felt like the stakes are too high to do things the Quak­er way. ‘We can’t do it the Quak­er way.’ ”

Real­ly great arti­cle in The Verge about the cables that route inter­net traf­fic across the oceans and the peo­ple who keep them in repair. Well writ­ten, amaz­ing­ly illus­trat­ed, with grip­ping per­son­al stories.