I wrote up a little something about this weekend’s presentation on the Quaker peace testimony that I gave at Cropwell Meeting on Sunday. I think it turned out well. I have no actual pictures of the event because I was up front leading it. In content it was not unrelated to my August Friends Journal column, “Wrestling with the Peace Testimony” but it was a whole heck of a lot tamer, as I was aiming it at new-to-Quaker attenders who don’t know anything about the peace testimony other than we have one. Ukraine is a hard problem for them, as it is for many of us long-term activists.
One result of my prep was diving deeper into the English Civil War (perhaps more accurately, wars) than I have previously. As an American, I only dimly know that there were one but as I kept digging down I realized just how essential it was to both the start of Friends and the drafting of the famous Declaration of 1660 to Charles II. We sometimes act as if the recipient was incidental, as if the king were simply cc’ed on a minute. But it really was crafted for the king’s attention and it was a nonaggression pact of sorts: Quakers wouldn’t challenge his authority or the empire if he just left them alone. It’s quite likely a statement like this was essential for the Quaker movement to survive the royal government’s backlash against the revolutionaries but it seems just as clear that the statement installed guard rails on the purview of Quaker political action. There were parts of the empire that warranted a challenge — slavery and colonialism in particular — and the 1660 Friends sidestepped those questions.
Anyway, I have a slideshow and a practice run so if anyone wants me to repeat the presentation for another Quaker group I could easily do it.