Choosing to thrive

March 11, 2025

Craig Bar­nett on UK meet­ings that are attract­ing new­com­ers: “New­com­ers need to be made wel­come, includ­ing chil­dren. They need to find peo­ple who enjoy spend­ing time togeth­er, who are open about their spir­i­tu­al expe­ri­ence, and will­ing to share the rich­es of the Quak­er way with them. They need to expe­ri­ence Quak­er wor­ship that is expec­tant and gath­ered, where peo­ple take the risk of open­ness to the Spir­it that leads to deep and vul­ner­a­ble spo­ken ministry.”

Still looking for articles on the 400th anniversary of George Fox’s birth

March 11, 2025

The June/July _Friends Journal_ will look at Quak­er founder George Fox at 400. We haven’t got­ten a lot of arti­cles yet so we’ve extend­ed the dead­line and are beat­ing the bush­es (well, the socials) for prospec­tive writ­ers. Maybe I have only myself to blame, as my call for sub­mis­sions won­dered whether this was an appro­pri­ate topic:

> Still, there’s a very good ques­tion to be asked (and per­haps an arti­cle to be writ­ten) about whether we should be mak­ing this kind of a fuss for George Fox.

Despite that, I think there’s a good pur­pose to look­ing back like this and hope there’s some arti­cles in their pipeline to send to us by March 25th. 

How do we use money?

March 11, 2025

The newest Friends Jour­nal issue is out, look­ing at how we use mon­ey. It’s per­haps not the sex­i­est top­ic but it speaks to what we val­ue as a body of believ­ers. Are we focused on our inter­nal group or on the world out­side our walls? Some­times the dis­cus­sions around mon­ey are tedious and our deci­sions self-evident. I think it’s pos­si­ble for a meet­ing to spend too much time focused on its own self-management. But there are times when dis­cus­sions of resource use brings out sur­pris­ing inspiration. 

Claire Flourish examines a Quaker anti-trans campaign

March 11, 2025

Fas­ci­nat­ing and dis­turb­ing account of an out­spo­ken Quak­er* UK anti-trans activist who has start­ed a video pod­cast inter­view­ing promi­nent Friends. Most of the episodes have noth­ing to do with gen­der and sex­u­al­i­ty but some do. 

The aster­isk up is there because the pod­cast­er appar­ent­ly renounced their mem­ber­ship in the Soci­ety of Friends when Britain Year­ly Meet­ing passed a minute on trans inclu­sion. I appre­ci­ate some­one dis­agree­ing with a year­ly meet­ing res­o­lu­tion and even stay­ing in the fold despite the oppo­si­tion. But when an affirm­ing minute that doesn’t actu­al­ly affect you (just your ide­ol­o­gy) is such a bur­den that you leave… well then the ques­tion is why you would put such effort into a pod­cast of your ex-religion. it doesn’t seem like a project borne in good faith. 

Claire does a great job bring­ing the receipts and explain­ing the con­text (the details of which I haven’t been following). 

Nilay Patel on why blogs are still great

March 11, 2025

The Verge’s Decoder turns the table on its host, Nilay Patel, to talk about blogs. I often appre­ci­ate Patel’s take on the mod­ern web. And while I run a few web­sites, I appre­ci­ate his joke that The Verge is “the last web­site on earth.” There was a cer­tain kind of web­site back in the day that you’d vis­it direct­ly to see what they were say­ing. Their reporters were fun­ny and snarky and opin­ion­at­ed and even when I dis­agreed with their take, I was usu­al­ly glad I had tak­en the time to read it. There’s a few indi­vid­ual blog­gers like that left, folks like Jason Kot­tke and John Gru­ber, but few sites still like The Verge, in my opin­ion. So much of the con­ver­sa­tion today hap­pens on social media, where it’s frac­tured (Mastodon? Face­book? Threads? Bluesky?) and ephemeral.

About a year ago, The Verge went for a more old-school blog­ging mod­el, based on appeal­ing to peo­ple vis­it­ing the site direct­ly rather than Google algo­rithms. I’m glad they did that. 

There’s also good stuff in her about brands: “But you know what? All the celebri­ties still want to be on the cov­er of mag­a­zines. They want the val­i­da­tion that the big brand, the insti­tu­tion, can pro­vide. And there’s a rea­son for that because the brand stands for more than just an indi­vid­ual opin­ion — or at least at its best it does.” I think that’s true for my work with Friends Jour­nal. Any­one can write some­thing and post it any­where, yet there still seems to be a yearn­ing for a place that’s still a common-ground water­ing hole, a conversation-starter.