Legacy or burden?

Lega­cy or burden?

One issue to which I am par­tic­u­lar­ly sen­si­tive is how our obses­sion with the past comes across to new­com­ers. Some peo­ple (espe­cial­ly those with Quak­er ances­tors) are excit­ed by our his­to­ry, while oth­er peo­ple are turned off or sim­ply puz­zled by Quak­er jar­gon and Quak­er genealo­gies, which they expe­ri­ence as a seri­ous bar­ri­er to being included.

Lega­cy or burden?

Related Posts:

  • Com­cas­tic lega­cy
    Com­cast lit­er­al­ly did­n’t know how to give me access to their stream­ing apps with­out also mail­ing me this six pound…
  • The Rise of Lib­er­al Quak­erism, Part 7
    The Rise of Lib­er­al Quak­erism, Part 7 This was the first direct Quak­er con­fronta­tion with the state in more than 200…
  • We don’t need God?
    Jeff Kisling responds to the click­baity Guardian piece about Quak­er don’t need God My expe­ri­ence that ‘con­ser­v­a­tive’ Friends do believe…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments on Quaker Ranter Daily