Craig Barnett on diversity in our meetings:
But Friends who are not satisfied with these excuses, and want to encourage real dialogue about the possibility of more inclusive Quaker communities, are often unclear about the specifically Quaker motivation for this. Are there any reasons, beyond so-called ‘political correctness’, why Quakers should have a particular concern for the diversity of our Meetings and our movement?
It’s good to ask these questions but Craig’s answer feels half-hearted to me. It boils down to Quaker process: we can make better decisions if we have more diverse perspectives. That’s certainly true, but the problem could just as easily be solved by dissolving the Friends movement and joining in with more diverse communities (something individual Friends have done). Asking people to join us because it will solve our problems isn’t a very strong marketing pitch. What is it we possess that we should be sharing more widely?