Reddit Thread on Quakers and Generative AI Art

August 4, 2026

An inter­est­ing Red­dit thread on “Quak­ers and Gen­er­a­tive AI Art” by user balsawoodspirit.

I encour­age Friends to please remem­ber that Gen­er­a­tive AI art is pro­duced uneth­i­cal­ly from AI mod­els that scrape the work of real artists with­out con­sent or com­pen­sa­tion. In the last few weeks, I have encoun­tered two instances of Quak­ers using Gen­er­a­tive AI as a part of their Out­reach. This is deeply dis­turb­ing to me. There is no legit­i­mate rea­son to use Gen­er­a­tive AI Art. You can use open source images, you can hire artists, or you can make your own art. Or, use no art at all. Bet­ter that than to steal from artists and dis­play art you hand no hand in making.

My Face­book feed is awash in ter­ri­ble AI art accom­pa­nied by ter­ri­ble AI-written feel-good sto­ries, shared as much by Quak­ers as by any oth­er demo­graph­ic (my bad for still being on there, perhaps).

Quak­erism is a spir­i­tu­al­i­ty that requires active par­tic­i­pa­tion. You can’t just nod off in the back (well, you can but you should­n’t). Quak­er com­mu­ni­ties have been lived expe­ri­ences. As some­one who works dai­ly with writ­ers, it’s stun­ning just how much AI has become a crutch for peo­ple. There are some very active writ­ers in Quak­er online spaces whose work is most­ly AI. Is it for the social boost that comes from being ubiquitous?

A weird tan­gent but hear me out: if you read a lot of clas­sic Quak­er jour­nals, there’s fre­quent­ly sto­ries from their teens in which the author con­scious­ly wres­tles with plain dress. They talk about the lost friend­ships that came when they adopt­ed a more uni­form style and also about how hard it is to dis­cern and nav­i­gate the inevitable voice of pride inside them­selves (look at me, I’m plain!) with their legit­i­mate wish and lead­ing to be of use to the fel­low­ship. That process of wrestling with ego is some­thing that nev­er ends for any of us, but espe­cial­ly not one of these min­is­ters. Know­ing when min­istry is Spirit-led or ego-fed is a core com­pe­ten­cy for this work. In the end, the dress did­n’t mat­ter so much. But the “baby steps” of wor­ry­ing about it was an ear­ly work­out of those dis­cern­ment muscles.

When we turn to AI we stop work­ing those mus­cles and offload so much to the machine. Skip­ping the baby steps means we’re not nec­es­sar­i­ly going to be as prac­ticed when impor­tant deci­sions need to be made. Let’s put out bad art if it means we’ll start learn­ing how to put out more authen­tic art as we develop.

Finding the Sweet Harmony in Friends Worship

August 3, 2026

The new issue of Friends Jour­nal is up. I wrote the Among Friends intro this month, wax­ing lyri­cal­ly on the “son­ic land­scape” of my meet­ing in August:

The sounds of our August silence are far from pure. Although the calls of red-shouldered hawks can be a bit harsh, hear­ing them reminds me that a fam­i­ly shares the trees of our bur­ial ground. The crunch of the grav­el in the dri­ve­way reas­sures me that one of our per­pet­u­al late-comers is about to join our fel­low­ship. Not all the sounds are nat­ur­al, of course. Once or twice in the hour some­one will red­line a motor­cy­cle on the street out­side, the whiny revs and gear changes drift­ing over to bounce inside our wor­ship space. I usu­al­ly try to tune out this sound, but some­times I smile instead, know­ing that some­one is hav­ing fun on a hot sum­mer day. I say a lit­tle prayer for their safe­ty and wish them well.

I’ve also record­ed a new episode of my author video pod­cast with John Held­ing, who wrote How Can I Keep from Singing? The Mar­velous Mys­tery of Worship-Fluid Meet­ings. He tells a great sto­ry of going from a very died-in-the wool unpro­grammed meet­ing to Lopez Island Wor­ship Group (now full Quak­er meet­ing) that sched­uled month­ly singing wor­ship and wor­ship shar­ing. I think I’m always going to pre­fer the mod­el of sit­ting down qui­et­ly and wait­ing for the Holy Spir­it but I do appre­ci­ate that it’s hard to build up a meet­ing cul­ture that invites min­istry. I’m hap­py that the wor­ship shar­ing at Lopez Island helped uncork nascent min­istry in the stan­dard, open worship. 

As I wrote a few years ago, I think min­istry should be an expect­ed mir­a­cle and not have quite so high a bar that peo­ple are intim­i­dat­ed from speak­ing. It takes prac­tice to know when min­istry is Spirit-led and maybe part of that prac­tice is not always get­ting it right. I know some meet­ings face the oppo­site prob­lem: min­istry that is per­haps too fre­quent and too head­strong and inap­pro­pri­ate. But a Friends Meet­ing is a bit like a choir in that it is always need­ing cre­ative rene­go­ti­a­tion to find the sweet har­mo­ny. We are a cho­sen fam­i­ly that just shows up every week, with peo­ple expe­ri­enced and new work­ing and learn­ing how to hold the body together.

U.S, Quaker Colleges Responding to War in the 1940s

July 31, 2026

From Sergei Grushko, a look at the choic­es of Quak­er insti­tu­tions in a time of war:

World War II pre­sent­ed a severe chal­lenge for Amer­i­can col­leges. But per­haps no group faced a more dif­fi­cult dilem­ma than the insti­tu­tions of high­er edu­ca­tion found­ed by Quak­ers. How could they rec­on­cile a centuries-old wit­ness to peace with the need to survive?

I didn’t know much of this his­to­ry and nev­er thought about the exis­ten­tial threats to high­er edu­ca­tion in the 1940s when cam­pus­es were large­ly emp­tied of their male students.

The Peaceable Kingdom Lost

June 30, 2026

A sto­ry by Charles Fox of just a few of the mas­sacres of Indige­nous peo­ple in Penn­syl­va­nia in the late 1700s. While the Friends and Mora­vians often har­bored endan­gered Susque­han­nock, their paci­fism meant they were large­ly unable to stop the maraud­ing Scots-Irish who were doing the killing.

As one his­to­ri­an wrote:

The fron­tier did col­lapse in late 1763. The sur­prise was that the armed mob that descend­ed from the fron­tier into Lan­cast­er — and then to Philadel­phia in 1764 — were White fron­tiers­men. Every­body had expect­ed it would be Indians.

Even more trag­i­cal­ly, a few of the peo­ple who escaped the mobs end­ed up being slaugh­tered in lat­er attacks. Much of the colo­nial gov­ern­ment was­n’t Quak­er in the lat­ter half of the cen­tu­ry, includ­ing some of William Pen­n’s descen­dants. Still, Friends today can won­der whether the high-minded promis­es of eter­nal friend­ship between Quak­ers and Indige­nous Peo­ples were more hol­low and aspi­ra­tional than we’d like to admit. (Of course most of the Lenape and Susque­han­nock died from European-imported dis­eases, with every boat­load of set­tlers bring­ing more death to the orig­i­nal inhabitants.)

Johan Maurer: Whose faith? Whose practice?

April 16, 2026

Johan Mau­r­er brings up a ques­tion in a post about what was the Lon­don Year­ly Meet­ing’s book of Chris­t­ian Faith and Prac­tice. He asks whether our prac­tices should be treat­ed as mod­els we’d expect oth­er Chris­tians to follow.

I sup­pose that in either case, Chris­t­ian or Quak­er, the pre­vail­ing assump­tion was that these books are for inter­nal use among Friends. This is who we are, more or less. But what I like about the title Chris­t­ian Faith and Prac­tice is anoth­er inter­pre­ta­tion entire­ly, one I have no per­mis­sion or evi­dence to pro­pose: this way of faith and life is not just for us; it’s rec­om­mend­ed for all Chris­tians.

I’d argue a strong yes to this. When I think about what ancient Quak­er odd­i­ties might still be rel­e­vant, one of the ques­tions I ask myself is whether we could argue that the whole church should also adopt the prac­tice (how­ev­er unlike­ly that might be in real­i­ty). If it’s just some Quak­er canard, we can toss it into an antiq­ui­ty dust­bin. But if all Chris­tians should be fol­low­ing the prac­tice, then let’s set the example.

I like Thomas Clarkson’s his­tor­i­cal account of Friends par­tic­u­lar­ly because he’s not writ­ing for a Quak­er audi­ence. I get the feel­ing he’s hold­ing our prac­tices up for scruti­ny, as if to say that maybe every­one should be fol­low­ing them and indeed, his paci­fism and abo­li­tion­ism were great­ly influ­enced by the Friends he met in his work.

Of course this wit­ness to oth­er Chris­tians sort of falls apart if we don’t con­sid­er our­selves Chris­t­ian. If online dis­course is any indi­ca­tion, there are large num­bers of Quak­ers who are rather obliv­i­ous that almost all of our Quak­er iden­ti­ty has a bib­li­cal basis (selec­tive, of course, and also inter­pret­ed, debat­ed and chang­ing). Quak­erism is seen as some­thing that just ran­dom­ly popped up in the world. None of the ear­ly Friends would have thought that.

Cesar Chavez and me

March 19, 2026

Wow, so stunned to read the reports of Cesar Chavez abus­ing young girls and rap­ing Unit­ed Farm Work­er VP Dolores Huer­ta.

In the mid-80s I was one of the many ide­al­is­tic col­lege kids who interned with the UFW for a sum­mer. I got to hang out with him a num­ber of times. His son-in-law ran the NYC-based media cam­paign and Cesar would come for plan­ning meet­ings but also to vis­it his daugh­ter and grand­kids. She made great cheese enchi­ladas and all of us would talk late into the night as he told stories.

I do remem­ber think­ing — and ask­ing — why the saint­ed VP Dolores Huer­ta nev­er actu­al­ly seemed all that involved, at least not to the point of ever com­ing East that sum­mer to par­tic­i­pate in NYC-based media strat­e­gy meet­ings. It was explained she was need­ed back in Cal­i­for­nia.1 I nev­er met her. I remem­ber not being sur­prised at all that she did­n’t ascend to the UFW pres­i­den­cy when Cesar died. It went instead to the son-in-law who had led our office.

My direct super­vi­sor was a schlub and sex­ist pig. He was always mak­ing inap­pro­pri­ate­ly sug­ges­tive com­ments to the young female interns, which they uni­ver­sal­ly laughed off. They were all smart, con­fi­dent women with futures who weren’t going to be put off by him. I was the only male intern that sum­mer and he put me in shit­ty assign­ments, pres­sur­ing me to drop out. I assume I was seen as com­pe­ti­tion and indeed I did start dat­ing a fel­low intern (the only rea­son I put up with his behav­ior and made it through the sum­mer). I see he’s still with the UFW, now list­ed as first vice pres­i­dent, which is not at all inspiring.

It was per­haps the most dys­func­tion­al office cul­ture I’ve ever seen. The union’s influ­ence had obvi­ous­ly declined since the heady days of RFK march­ing with Cesar in huge ral­lies. They seemed to jump from fad to fad hop­ing to recap­ture atten­tion. That year direct mar­ket­ing was all the rage in busi­ness cir­cles and the UFW was jump­ing in with both feet. We would spend hours in meet­ings set­ting unre­al­is­tic expec­ta­tions, then break our own guide­lines to “meet” them. I’d be called out for try­ing to do things the way we had agreed. I remem­ber won­der­ing if any of the office work I did that sum­mer actu­al­ly made a jot of dif­fer­ence. Help­ing to orga­nize East Coast appear­ances of Cesar was def­i­nite­ly the high­light of the sum­mer — well, that and the girl­friend and get­ting to hang out in New York City all the time.

I do have to won­der now if some of the dys­func­tion and sex­ism in the office was ulti­mate­ly relat­ed to Cesar’s repeat­ed molesta­tion of chil­dren.2 Did he fos­ter a cul­ture in which we laughed off bad behav­ior and did­n’t ques­tion poor management?

blank
NYTimes inves­ti­ga­tion

Tim Gee tracks down Ann Lee’s Quaker connection

March 17, 2026

I always love a lit­tle sleuthing and all the bet­ter if it argues against some poor­ly researched report that made its way to Wikipedia.

The claim is that Shak­er leader Ann Lee was born a Quak­er. The Wikipedia entry says: “Her par­ents were mem­bers of a dis­tinct branch of the Soci­ety of Friends (a sect of Quak­ers) and too poor to afford their chil­dren even the rudi­ments of edu­ca­tion.” The source of this is giv­en in the cita­tion: a 1879 ency­clo­pe­dia arti­cle, a copy of which is host­ed on Wik­isource: “Her par­ents were mem­bers of a dis­tinct branch of the soci­ety of Friends, and too poor to afford their chil­dren even the rudi­ments of edu­ca­tion.” A source for this claim was nev­er giv­en in the ency­clo­pe­dia, though lat­er on it does ref­er­ence Fred­er­ick William Evans, a much lat­er Shak­er figure.

That is the Tim Gee com­piles five pieces of evi­dence that togeth­er feel very con­vinc­ing.

There are of course influ­ences but that’s to be expect­ed. Every reli­gious move­ment of the Sec­ond Great Awak­en­ing had some rela­tion­ship to Quak­ers. The Methodists, Mor­mons, Holi­ness, Adven­tists all have some con­nec­tions. When you tour the “1652 Coun­try” area of Eng­land, where George Fox first brought Quak­ers togeth­er, you’ll keep run­ning into signs about John Wes­ley doing the same for Methodists a cen­tu­ry lat­er, and here in South Jer­sey where I live a whole slew of Quak­ers became Methodists in the ear­ly 1800s. At least one ear­ly Mor­mon evan­ge­list in Ohio essen­tial­ly went from Quak­er town to Quak­er town try­ing to recruit peo­ple. The Quak­er defense of female lead­er­ship and the prin­ci­ple that women can preach obvi­ous­ly rubbed off on the Shak­ers and oth­er movements.

The idea that the British colonies in Amer­i­ca were some pure land where we could rein­vent a prim­i­tive Chris­tian­i­ty was a pow­er­ful meme (if you will) at the time and cer­tain­ly drew Ann Lee to cross over and plant a reli­gious move­ment here. But Ann Lee picked one of the least Quak­er areas to plant her com­mu­ni­ty and drew ear­ly mem­bers from New Eng­land mil­len­ni­al­ist revival­ists. She def­i­nite­ly want­ed to build some­thing dis­tinct from Friends.

www.friendsjournal.org www​.friend​sjour​nal​.org

March 29: A Quaker Trans Day of Visibility Gathering

March 10, 2026

Ten authors fea­tured in the March 2026 Friends Jour­nal spe­cial issue on gen­der and sex­u­al iden­ti­ties join trans and non­bi­na­ry mod­er­a­tors for facil­i­tat­ed con­ver­sa­tion. Free and both online at at Swarth­more Col­lege. Learn more here.

I wrote the intro­duc­to­ry col­umn for this issue. Here’s a taste:

am grate­ful that both our reli­gious soci­ety and wider cul­ture have devel­oped a greater under­stand­ing of the diver­si­ty of gen­der expres­sions. I appre­ci­ate an expand­ed vocab­u­lary with which to include peo­ple. (Only ten years ago the sin­gu­lar “they” was still cau­tioned against in the Friends Jour­nal style guide!) Change can be con­fus­ing and bewil­der­ing, but open con­ver­sa­tions between Friends one-on-one and in set­tings like a clear­ness com­mit­tee can help us under­stand one anoth­er in our long­ing to be known and loved.

You can read the whole issue on Friends Jour­nal.

A Quaker Trans Day of Visibility Gathering: A free online & in person event for Friends A Quak­er Trans Day of Vis­i­bil­i­ty Gath­er­ing: A free online & in per­son event for Friends